linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: P@draigBrady.com
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, matthew@wil.cx, arjan@infradead.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] X86: Optimise fls(), ffs() and fls64()
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:13:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18695.1271250815@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BACCB4E.7010108@draigBrady.com>

Pádraig Brady <P@draigBrady.com> wrote:

> Benchmarks would be useful for this patch set.

Okay.

Using the attached test program:

	warthog>time ./get_order 
	real    1m37.191s
	user    1m36.313s
	sys     0m0.861s
	warthog>time ./get_order x
	real    0m16.892s
	user    0m16.586s
	sys     0m0.287s
	warthog>time ./get_order x x
	real    0m7.731s
	user    0m7.727s
	sys     0m0.002s

Using the current upstream fls64() as a basis for an inlined get_order() [the
second result above] is much faster than using the current out-of-line
loop-based get_order() [the first result above].

Using my optimised inline fls64()-based get_order() [the third result above]
is even faster still.

I ran the above on my Core2 desktop box running x86_64 Fedora 12.

Also note that I compiled the test program with -O3, so I had to do things to
prevent gcc from optimising the call to fls64() or get_order() away, such as
adding up the results and sticking them in a global variable, and not having
too few values passed to get_order(), lest gcc calculate them in advance.

So it would be useful to decide if we can optimise fls() and fls64() for
x86_64.  Certainly it would be useful to replace the out-of-line get_order()
for x86_64.

David
---
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>

#ifndef __x86_64__
#error
#endif

#define BITS_PER_LONG 64

#define PAGE_SHIFT 12

typedef unsigned long long __u64, u64;
typedef unsigned int __u32, u32;
#define noinline	__attribute__((noinline))

static __always_inline int fls64(__u64 x)
{
	long bitpos = -1;

	asm("bsrq %1,%0"
	    : "+r" (bitpos)
	    : "rm" (x));
	return bitpos + 1;
}

static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word)
{
	asm("bsr %1,%0"
	    : "=r" (word)
	    : "rm" (word));
	return word;
}
static __always_inline int old_fls64(__u64 x)
{
	if (x == 0)
		return 0;
	return __fls(x) + 1;
}

static noinline // __attribute__((const))
int old_get_order(unsigned long size)
{
	int order;

	size = (size - 1) >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 1);
	order = -1;
	do {
		size >>= 1;
		order++;
	} while (size);
	return order;
}

static inline __attribute__((const))
int __get_order_old_fls64(unsigned long size)
{
	int order;
	size--;
	size >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
	order = old_fls64(size);
	return order;
}

static inline __attribute__((const))
int __get_order(unsigned long size)
{
	int order;
	size--;
	size >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
	order = fls64(size);
	return order;
}

#define get_order_old_fls64(n)						\
	(								\
		__get_order_old_fls64(n)				\
	)

#define get_order(n)							\
	(								\
		__get_order(n)						\
	)

unsigned long prevent_optimise_out;

static noinline unsigned long test_old_get_order(void)
{
	unsigned long n, total = 0;
	long rep, loop;

	for (rep = 1000000; rep > 0; rep--) {
		for (loop = 0; loop <= 16384; loop += 4) {
			n = 1UL << loop;
			total += old_get_order(n);
		}
	}
	return total;
}

static noinline unsigned long test_get_order_old_fls64(void)
{
	unsigned long n, total = 0;
	long rep, loop;

	for (rep = 1000000; rep > 0; rep--) {
		for (loop = 0; loop <= 16384; loop += 4) {
			n = 1UL << loop;
			total += get_order_old_fls64(n);
		}
	}
	return total;
}

static noinline unsigned long test_get_order(void)
{
	unsigned long n, total = 0;
	long rep, loop;

	for (rep = 1000000; rep > 0; rep--) {
		for (loop = 0; loop <= 16384; loop += 4) {
			n = 1UL << loop;
			total += get_order(n);
		}
	}
	return total;
}

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	unsigned long total;

	switch (argc) {
	case 1:  total = test_old_get_order();		break;
	case 2:  total = test_get_order_old_fls64();	break;
	default: total = test_get_order();		break;
	}
	prevent_optimise_out = total;
	return 0;
}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-14 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4BACCB4E.7010108@draigBrady.com>
2010-03-26 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] X86: Optimise fls(), ffs() and fls64() David Howells
2010-03-26 14:42   ` [PATCH 2/3] Adjust the comment on get_order() to describe the size==0 case David Howells
2010-03-26 14:42   ` [PATCH 3/3] Optimise get_order() David Howells
2010-03-26 14:42     ` David Howells
2010-03-26 17:23   ` [PATCH 1/3] X86: Optimise fls(), ffs() and fls64() Linus Torvalds
2010-03-26 17:37     ` Scott Lurndal
2010-03-26 17:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2010-04-06 13:57         ` Jamie Lokier
2010-04-06 14:40           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-26 17:42   ` David Howells
2010-03-26 17:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-26 17:58       ` Ralf Baechle
2010-03-26 18:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-03-26 18:16           ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-04-06 13:30           ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-04-14 11:49           ` David Howells
2010-04-14 14:30             ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15  8:48             ` David Howells
2010-04-15  8:49               ` Avi Kivity
2010-04-15 11:41                 ` Jamie Lokier
2010-03-26 17:52     ` Matthew Wilcox
2010-04-14 13:13   ` David Howells [this message]
2010-01-13 19:39 David Howells
2010-01-13 20:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-01-13 21:59 ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18695.1271250815@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=P@draigBrady.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).