From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Juergen Gross <JGross@suse.com>,
Michal Marek <MMarek@suse.com>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Xen: remove -fshort-wchar gcc flag
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:01:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1924668.nNs2RHZJcd@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57AC90F5020000780010515A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Thursday, August 11, 2016 6:51:33 AM CEST Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 11.08.16 at 14:39, <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > A previous patch added the --no-wchar-size-warning to the Makefile to
> > avoid this harmless warning:
> >
> > arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: warning: drivers/xen/efi.o uses 2-byte wchar_t yet the
> > output is to use 4-byte wchar_t; use of wchar_t values across objects may
> > fail
> >
> > Changing kbuild to use thin archives instead of recursive linking
> > unfortunately brings the same warning back during the final link.
> >
> > This time, we remove the -fshort-wchar flag that originally caused
> > the warning, hopefully fixing the problem for good. I don't see
> > any reason for having the flag in the first place, as the Xen code
> > does not use wchar_t at all.
>
> It uses efi_char16_t, and by dropping -fshort-wchar you'd open
> up a trap for anyone to fall into who were to add wide string
> literals to that same file. EFI using 16-bit characters requires
> code interfacing with EFI to do so too.
I don't understand. How is this different from other source files
that use efi_char16_t or the wchar_t definition from include/linux/nls.h?
As far as I can tell, they all use 16-bit characters, but none of the
others sets the flag. Maybe we should just always build with -fshort-wchar
from the top-level Makefile?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-11 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 10:16 [PATCH 0/6 v2] kbuild changes, thin archives, --gc-sections Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` [PATCH 1/6] kbuild: allow architectures to use thin archives instead of ld -r Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` [PATCH 2/6] kbuild: allow archs to select link dead code/data elimination Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` [PATCH 3/6] kbuild: add arch specific post-link pass Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-16 9:23 ` Michal Marek
2016-08-17 4:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-17 4:43 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-17 9:05 ` Michal Marek
2016-08-17 9:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-08-17 9:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2016-08-18 0:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: switch to using thin archives Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/64: use linker dead code elimination Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc: use the new post-link pass to check relocations Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 10:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-11 12:31 ` [PATCH 0/6 v2] kbuild changes, thin archives, --gc-sections Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-11 12:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-11 12:39 ` [PATCH] Xen: remove -fshort-wchar gcc flag Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 12:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 12:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2016-08-11 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-11 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-08-11 14:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-11 14:06 ` Jan Beulich
2016-08-24 17:18 ` David Vrabel
2016-08-11 13:55 ` [EXPERIMENTAL] enable thin archives and --gc-sections on ARM Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 13:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 20:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-08-11 20:01 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-08-11 20:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 20:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-11 21:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-08-23 6:17 ` [PATCH 0/6 v2] kbuild changes, thin archives, --gc-sections Nicholas Piggin
2016-08-23 6:17 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1924668.nNs2RHZJcd@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=JGross@suse.com \
--cc=MMarek@suse.com \
--cc=amodra@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@linaro.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).