* mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include?
@ 2008-11-25 20:06 Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25 20:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-01 13:01 ` David Howells
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-11-25 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells, Koichi Yasutake, linux-am33-list; +Cc: linux arch
Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
Are you planning to do so for mn10300 for next merge window?
Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
The other are done or have patches queued for next merge window to do so.
Can I be of any help?
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include?
2008-11-25 20:06 mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include? Sam Ravnborg
@ 2008-11-25 20:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-01 13:01 ` David Howells
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-11-25 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells, Koichi Yasutake, linux-am33-list; +Cc: linux arch
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:06:44PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
>
> Are you planning to do so for mn10300 for next merge window?
>
> Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
h8300 already moved - there was a stale file that fooloed me.
The other got a reminder too but I dropped linux-arch from cc.
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include?
2008-11-25 20:06 mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include? Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25 20:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
@ 2008-12-01 13:01 ` David Howells
2008-12-01 13:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Howells @ 2008-12-01 13:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: dhowells, Koichi Yasutake, linux-am33-list, linux arch
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
> Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
>
> Are you planning to do so for mn10300 for next merge window?
>
> Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
> The other are done or have patches queued for next merge window to do so.
>
> Can I be of any help?
I thought I'd do it after the next merge window. There are a bunch of patches
that munge header files around waiting to go in from Harvey Harrison, I
believe.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include?
2008-12-01 13:01 ` David Howells
@ 2008-12-01 13:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2008-12-01 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Howells; +Cc: Koichi Yasutake, linux-am33-list, linux arch
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 01:01:17PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:
>
> > Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include
> >
> > Are you planning to do so for mn10300 for next merge window?
> >
> > Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300
> > The other are done or have patches queued for next merge window to do so.
> >
> > Can I be of any help?
>
> I thought I'd do it after the next merge window. There are a bunch of patches
> that munge header files around waiting to go in from Harvey Harrison, I
> believe.
Great!
I will drop you a patch later that may help a little.
A fix for kbuild scheduled for next merge window will also help
and you will need that I think.
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-01 13:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-25 20:06 mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include? Sam Ravnborg
2008-11-25 20:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-01 13:01 ` David Howells
2008-12-01 13:13 ` Sam Ravnborg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox