From: Arun Sharma <arun.sharma@intel.com>
To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SHMLBA and compat tasks
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:41:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040228014128.GA6897@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1102 bytes --]
The current Linux implementation of shmat() insists on SHMLBA alignment
even when shmflg & SHM_RND == 0. This is not consistent with the man pages
and the single UNIX spec, which require only a page-aligned address.
man page:
> If shmaddr isn’t NULL and SHM_RND is asserted in shmflg, the attach
> occurs at the address equal to shmaddr rounded down to the nearest mul-
> tiple of SHMLBA. Otherwise shmaddr must be a page-aligned address at
> which the attach occurs.
This is not a problem for many platforms because SHMLBA == PAGE_SIZE. It's
also not a problem for 64 bit programs running on 64 bit platforms,
because arch_get_unmapped_area() typically guarantees SHMLBA alignment,
even when SHM_RND is not asserted.
However, for 32 bit compatiblity programs, an innocuous sequence such as:
p = shmat(id, 0, shmflg) /* shmflag & SHM_RND == 0 */
/* p is page-aligned, but may not be SHMLBA aligned */
shmdt(p)
shmat(id, p, shmflg) == -EINVAL ??
can fail. The attached patch fixes the problem for ia64. Can other arch
maintainers confirm that it doesn't break anything for you ?
-Arun
[-- Attachment #2: shmat.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 339 bytes --]
--- linux/ipc/shm.c.orig 2003-04-28 11:19:24.000000000 -0700
+++ linux/ipc/shm.c 2003-05-09 13:26:13.000000000 -0700
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@
if (addr & (SHMLBA-1)) {
if (shmflg & SHM_RND)
addr &= ~(SHMLBA-1); /* round down */
- else
+ else if (addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
}
flags = MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED;
next reply other threads:[~2004-02-28 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-28 1:41 Arun Sharma [this message]
2004-02-28 23:55 ` SHMLBA and compat tasks David S. Miller
2004-02-29 2:11 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-01 5:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-01 19:33 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-01 19:41 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-01 20:11 ` David S. Miller
2004-03-01 20:17 ` David Mosberger
2004-03-01 20:16 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-01 20:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-03-02 19:43 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-06 2:37 ` Arun Sharma
2004-03-06 7:39 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040228014128.GA6897@intel.com \
--to=arun.sharma@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox