From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:9434 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261414AbUCAUOh (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:14:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 12:11:22 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: SHMLBA and compat tasks Message-Id: <20040301121122.20e19d9f.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <16451.37325.109790.457348@napali.hpl.hp.com> References: <20040228014128.GA6897@intel.com> <20040228155529.64bc0741.davem@redhat.com> <20040229021105.GA6964@intel.com> <20040229215752.3a6f0ce7.davem@redhat.com> <20040301193308.GA13305@intel.com> <16451.37325.109790.457348@napali.hpl.hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: davidm@hpl.hp.com Cc: davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com, arun.sharma@intel.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:41:01 -0800 David Mosberger wrote: > I assume you're asking me here (too many David's!). The answer is > that it's NOT OK to force 1MB alignment for IA-32 tasks. Why exactly is SHMLBA 1MB, something to do with the ia64 address space segments or something?