From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:24760 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263345AbUCSAlt (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:41:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:41:43 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: pci_map_single return value Message-Id: <20040318164143.2cc398b3.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040319001448.GP28212@krispykreme> References: <20031212155752.GD17683@krispykreme> <20031212175104.07dc8444.ak@suse.de> <20031212192131.GF17683@krispykreme> <20031213220444.4c526afa.davem@redhat.com> <20040102120121.GT28023@krispykreme> <20040102133454.22daa451.ak@suse.de> <20040319001448.GP28212@krispykreme> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Anton Blanchard Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:14:48 +1100 Anton Blanchard wrote: > Better late than never. Andrew does this look OK to you? ... > Introduce dma_error() and pci_dma_error() which is used to detect > failures in pci_map_single. This looks fine to me. We really need to backport the dma sync stuff and this (once integrated to 2.6.x) into 2.4.x, probably when 2.4.27-pre1 opens up.