From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH: x86] Add dma_mmap_coherent()
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 03:40:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040328114047.GO791@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040328123556.E2825@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
>> This has only been compile tested. There are two changes here:
>> 1. ensure that we zero the whole page - otherwise we may expose leak
>> kernel data to userspace in the remainder of the last page.
>> 2. add dma_mmap_coherent(). I've added checks for the offset and
>> size to ensure that we don't do anything silly (like mapping more
>> memory than the original coherent allocation covered.) Maybe this
>> is something that remap_page_range() should be doing anyway?
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 12:35:56PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> Actually, there is a problem with this patch as it stands - get_free_pages
> returns kernel pages, and remap_page_range() won't touch them without
> the pages being marked reserved. I'm also led to believe that splitting
> a struct page up into is constituent struct pages is no longer valid, so
> exactly how we do that is open to question.
I think we're just missing an API for it e.g. break_compound_page();
I don't see why we shouldn't arrange for it. Alternatively, clearing
PG_compound by hand is possible. Though I guess it raises the question
of what we're trying to do; e.g. why not allocate pieces separately?
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-28 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-28 10:22 [PATCH: x86] Add dma_mmap_coherent() Russell King
2004-03-28 10:40 ` [PATCH: ARM] " Russell King
2004-03-28 11:35 ` [PATCH: x86] " Russell King
2004-03-28 11:40 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-03-28 12:36 ` Russell King
2004-03-28 12:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-28 13:19 ` Russell King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040328114047.GO791@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox