From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:2834 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261154AbUC1LBg (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Mar 2004 06:01:36 -0500 Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 12:01:33 +0100 From: Russell King Subject: Future of linux-arch Message-ID: <20040328120133.D2825@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: Russell King To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dave Miller List-ID: It seems that me posting these two patches just to linux-arch has caused some upset in the kernel community. In particular, Christoph Hellwig is talking about publicising the address for this list. 11:48 < hch> rmk: why don't you simply CC lkml? 11:49 < hch> or actually subsribe lkml to linux-arch 11:49 < hch> that would be easiest 11:49 < rmk> because davem doesn't want the address getting into spammers databases. 11:49 < rmk> so we're not allowed to crosspost between linux-arch and lkml 11:49 < hch> well, I can get that one into it even without subsribing 11:50 < hch> and if doesn't stop beeing silly I'll just scatter websites containing mailto:linux-arch@vger.kernel.org all over google and apparantly according to David Woodhouse, this is somehow my problem. Sigh. Just warning people here when this becomes a complete spam haven. Sometimes I wonder why the fsck I bother following and defending peoples rules. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/ 2.6 Serial core