From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166]:6128 "EHLO natnoddy.rzone.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261764AbUDDKqW (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 06:46:22 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Consolidate sys32_select Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:36:49 +0200 References: <200404040204.03594.arnd@arndb.de> <200404040222.41413.arnd@arndb.de> <20040404122404.54329a2e.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20040404122404.54329a2e.ak@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200404041236.50349.arnd@arndb.de> To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:24, Andi Kleen wrote: > I'm a bit dubious about LTP - often their test cases are very poor > and just check EFAULT behaviour. For testing it's better to just boot > a 32bit distribution and make sure that at least some X desktop > works. Right, the quality of LTP testcases varies a lot, but they tend to check the more obscure stuff that you might not hit when everything goes right. I forgot to say that I'm running mostly 32 bit user space on my Opteron box, so the good path was probably exercised as well. Arnd <><