From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:27363 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261764AbUDDLHL (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Apr 2004 07:07:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2004 13:04:57 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Consolidate sys32_select Message-Id: <20040404130457.303fd823.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <200404041236.50349.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200404040204.03594.arnd@arndb.de> <200404040222.41413.arnd@arndb.de> <20040404122404.54329a2e.ak@suse.de> <200404041236.50349.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 12:36:49 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 04 April 2004 12:24, Andi Kleen wrote: > > I'm a bit dubious about LTP - often their test cases are very poor > > and just check EFAULT behaviour. For testing it's better to just boot > > a 32bit distribution and make sure that at least some X desktop > > works. > > Right, the quality of LTP testcases varies a lot, but they tend to > check the more obscure stuff that you might not hit when everything > goes right. Well, barely. The LSB test suite is a bit better, but it takes forever to run. There is also another test suite called ballista, but I never got it to run properly. > I forgot to say that I'm running mostly 32 bit user space on my > Opteron box, so the good path was probably exercised as well. Ok fine. I do too actually on my workstation, but I haven't booted your patches yet ;-) -Andi