public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>, Jan Glauber <glauber@gmx.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Patch] SMP call function cleanup
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:06:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040422140624.GW743@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1082641576.1714.36.camel@mulgrave>

On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:24, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> 	for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, foo->mask)
>> 		on_one_cpu(cpu, bar, ...);

On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 09:46:16AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> But the key is 'anyone in need of'.  What I'd like is for you to
> demonstrate a need of execute on cpumask before it gets added to the
> API.  Murphy's law says that when given a choice people invariably make
> the wrong one, so lets not introduce choice into the api unless it's
> absolutely necessary.

I remembered what cw told me. It was for ia64 repairing the suboptimal
situation where flush_tlb_mm() does the wrong thing and flushes on all
cpus regardless of mm->cpu_vm_mask. So we can drop this rather easily,
as even when it's resolved, that will be pure arch code that will have
the native IPI API's visible to it.

zwane wanted it for some 100% lockless timer code, but I think that's
dead or not getting merged in the near future, so the same applies.


-- wli

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-22 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22 12:21 [Patch] SMP call function cleanup Jan Glauber
2004-04-22 12:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-22 12:37   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-22 12:49     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-22 12:59     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-22 13:24       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-22 13:46         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-22 14:06           ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
     [not found]       ` <1082641822.1329.45.camel@halo>
     [not found]         ` <1082642332.1778.39.camel@mulgrave>
2004-04-22 14:15           ` Jan Glauber
2004-04-23  0:05     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-23  0:21       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-23  0:32         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-22 13:58   ` Jan Glauber
2004-04-22 12:33 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-22 14:00   ` Jan Glauber
2004-04-22 14:13     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-04-23  0:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-23 23:38 ` David S. Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-23  6:46 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-23  6:53 Martin Schwidefsky
2004-04-23  7:05 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-04-23  9:00   ` Russell King
2004-04-23  7:46 Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040422140624.GW743@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=glauber@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox