public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, epasch@de.ibm.com, hare@suse.de
Subject: static DEFINE_PER_CPU vs. modules
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 17:41:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405031741.52504.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)

I got a bug report about loading some modules on s390 (for the
privileged, see http://bugzilla.suse.de/show_bug.cgi?id=38820).

The problem is that modules are loaded to a virtual address 
that is far away (roughly main memory size) from the percpu
kernel section, but s390x-gcc generates only 32-bit relocations
for static variables.
My suspicion is that there are some more architectures where
a relocation for static variables is not sufficient for per-cpu
data. Can anyone confirm this?

Fortunately, this currently occurs only in scsi.ko and ipv6.ko
even for allmodconfig, so these are trivial to work around by
changing the scope of the percpu variables.

The idea I had for preventing the same bug from happening
in the future is to provoke a compile error for modules using
'static DEFINE_PER_CPU', see patch below.
Alternatively, we could introduce a 'STATIC_DEFINE_PER_CPU'
that replaces 'static DEFINE_PER_CPU' for non-module builds,
or redefine 'DEFINE_PER_CPU' in include/asm-s390 in a way that
the 'static' get silently ignored for modules.

	Arnd <><

===== drivers/scsi/scsi.c 1.142 vs edited =====
--- 1.142/drivers/scsi/scsi.c	Sun Apr  4 17:01:05 2004
+++ edited/drivers/scsi/scsi.c	Thu Apr 29 17:59:34 2004
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@
 /*
  * Per-CPU I/O completion queue.
  */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, scsi_done_q);
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct list_head, scsi_done_q);
 
 /**
  * scsi_done - Enqueue the finished SCSI command into the done queue.
===== include/asm-generic/percpu.h 1.10 vs edited =====
--- 1.10/include/asm-generic/percpu.h	Mon Jan 19 07:28:34 2004
+++ edited/include/asm-generic/percpu.h	Thu Apr 29 17:54:03 2004
@@ -7,8 +7,18 @@
 
 extern unsigned long __per_cpu_offset[NR_CPUS];
 
+/* modules must not use "static DEFINE_PER_CPU", so add an
+ * extern declaration that causes a compile error if somebody
+ * attempts */
+#ifndef MODULE
+#define __PER_CPU_NOSTATIC(decl)
+#else
+#define __PER_CPU_NOSTATIC(decl) extern decl;
+#endif
+
 /* Separate out the type, so (int[3], foo) works. */
 #define DEFINE_PER_CPU(type, name) \
+    __PER_CPU_NOSTATIC(__typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name) \
     __attribute__((__section__(".data.percpu"))) __typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name
 
 /* var is in discarded region: offset to particular copy we want */
@@ -27,6 +37,7 @@
 #else /* ! SMP */
 
 #define DEFINE_PER_CPU(type, name) \
+    __PER_CPU_NOSTATIC(__typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name) \
     __typeof__(type) per_cpu__##name
 
 #define per_cpu(var, cpu)			(*((void)cpu, &per_cpu__##var))
===== net/ipv6/icmp.c 1.49 vs edited =====
--- 1.49/net/ipv6/icmp.c	Fri Apr 16 22:54:44 2004
+++ edited/net/ipv6/icmp.c	Thu Apr 29 17:59:58 2004
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
  *
  *	On SMP we have one ICMP socket per-cpu.
  */
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct socket *, __icmpv6_socket) = NULL;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct socket *, __icmpv6_socket) = NULL;
 #define icmpv6_socket	__get_cpu_var(__icmpv6_socket)
 
 static int icmpv6_rcv(struct sk_buff **pskb, unsigned int *nhoffp);

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-03 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-03 15:41 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2004-05-03 17:50 ` static DEFINE_PER_CPU vs. modules David Mosberger
2004-05-03 18:01   ` Richard Henderson
2004-05-03 18:37     ` David Mosberger
2004-05-03 22:24       ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-05-03 23:12         ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04  8:56           ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-05-04  2:38 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 14:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-05-04 16:29     ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 19:03       ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 19:15         ` David Mosberger
2004-05-04 19:23           ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 19:45             ` David Mosberger
2004-05-05  8:21               ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-05-05  8:29                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-05  9:24                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-05-05  9:33                 ` Rusty Russell
2004-05-05 16:17                 ` David Mosberger
2004-05-05  3:18         ` Richard Henderson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-05 17:42 Martin Schwidefsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200405031741.52504.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=epasch@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox