From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:16549 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268371AbUHLCoD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:44:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:43:17 -0700 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: clear_user_highpage() Message-Id: <20040811194317.0acf4ae3.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20040811161537.5e24c2b6.davem@redhat.com> <20040812004654.GX11200@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Linus Torvalds Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:18:18 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > So I'd personally be a whole lot more interested in seeing whether we > could have per-CPU pages than in pre-zeroing. We have that cold/hot page thing in the current 2.6.x tree, or are you talking about something else? I'm talking about the struct per_cpu_pages stuff. It's the first thing buffered_rmqueue() checks when the request order of the page allocation is zero.