public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, akpm@osdl.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: RFC: being more anal about iospace accesses..
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:07:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908160737.7c1dfb5a.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409081543320.5912@ppc970.osdl.org>


I'm all for this except a possible naming suggestion that
the thing should be called "iomemspace" not plain "iospace".

We already use similar naming distinctions elsewhere in the tree
and even in user visible things such as /proc/ioport /proc/iomem

I wish we could make it fail with the compiler too somehow, that
way people other than us sparse geeks would see and fix this stuff
up.

Anyways, I like this a lot.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-08 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-08 22:57 RFC: being more anal about iospace accesses Linus Torvalds
2004-09-08 23:07 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-09-08 23:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09  1:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09  4:36     ` David S. Miller
2004-09-09  5:56       ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-09  5:04     ` viro
2004-09-09  5:05       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-09  5:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09  6:08         ` viro
2004-09-09  8:27   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-09  6:23 ` David Woodhouse
2004-09-09 13:14   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-11  6:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-11  6:42   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-11  7:26     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-11  7:29     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-11  7:23   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-11 14:42   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-15 15:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 19:02   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-15 19:16     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 19:40       ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-15 20:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 20:17           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 12:17           ` David Woodhouse
2004-09-16 13:52             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 20:20       ` Russell King
2004-09-15 20:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 20:51           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 22:38       ` James Bottomley
2004-09-16  2:33         ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-16  4:28           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16  4:57             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-16  4:58               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-16 13:41             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-16 18:21               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 18:52                 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 19:09                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 20:02                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 20:37                       ` James Bottomley
2004-09-16 20:42                         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 21:37                           ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-16 20:04                   ` David S. Miller
2004-09-16 20:13                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 20:45                       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-16 20:20                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-17  5:17                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-17 15:30                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 19:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 19:13                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 19:50                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 20:07                       ` Alan Cox
2004-09-17  5:44                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-17  5:20                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-17 15:03                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 22:30             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-16 22:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 22:46                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 23:15                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 23:30                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 23:43                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-17 12:44                 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040908160737.7c1dfb5a.davem@redhat.com \
    --to=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox