public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: RFC: being more anal about iospace accesses..
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 07:08:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040909060856.GZ23987@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409082209240.5912@ppc970.osdl.org>

On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 10:13:45PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes, I was thinking of having some way to disable these things. I think
> -Wbitwise was good, it would make sense to be able to do similar things
> for address-spaces too. Either on a source level with changing __iospace
> (aka __iomem), or having a sparse option to allow certain spaces to alias 
> each other.

BTW, is there any reason to have cpu_to_le32p() and its ilk as macros instead
of inlined functions?  If there isn't, I'd gladly lose the perversions I'm
currently using to deal with type checks and let the normal logics take care
of that...

Unlike cpu_to_...() these guys are obviously never constant, so that objection
does not apply.  AFAICS, all callers of that bunch would be OK with such
change, so unless there are dark and nasty arch-specific reasons, I'd rather
turn them into inlines...

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-09  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-08 22:57 RFC: being more anal about iospace accesses Linus Torvalds
2004-09-08 23:07 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-08 23:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09  1:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09  4:36     ` David S. Miller
2004-09-09  5:56       ` Richard Henderson
2004-09-09  5:04     ` viro
2004-09-09  5:05       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-09  5:13       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09  6:08         ` viro [this message]
2004-09-09  8:27   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-09  6:23 ` David Woodhouse
2004-09-09 13:14   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-11  6:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-11  6:42   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-11  7:26     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-11  7:29     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-11  7:23   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-11 14:42   ` Alan Cox
2004-09-15 15:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 19:02   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-09-15 19:16     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 19:40       ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-15 20:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 20:17           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 12:17           ` David Woodhouse
2004-09-16 13:52             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 20:20       ` Russell King
2004-09-15 20:34         ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 20:51           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-15 22:38       ` James Bottomley
2004-09-16  2:33         ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-16  4:28           ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16  4:57             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-16  4:58               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-16 13:41             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-16 18:21               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 18:52                 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 19:09                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 20:02                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 20:37                       ` James Bottomley
2004-09-16 20:42                         ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 21:37                           ` Grant Grundler
2004-09-16 20:04                   ` David S. Miller
2004-09-16 20:13                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 20:45                       ` David S. Miller
2004-09-16 20:20                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-17  5:17                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-17 15:30                     ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-16 19:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 19:13                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 19:50                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 20:07                       ` Alan Cox
2004-09-17  5:44                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-17  5:20                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-17 15:03                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 22:30             ` Matthew Wilcox
2004-09-16 22:42               ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 22:46                 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 23:15                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-16 23:30                     ` Jeff Garzik
2004-09-16 23:43                       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-17 12:44                 ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040909060856.GZ23987@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --to=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox