public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, jeremy@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] I/O space write barrier
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:07:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200409231507.26672.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1095966238.3043.26.camel@mulgrave>

On Thursday, September 23, 2004 3:03 pm, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 14:48, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > - RD_REG_WORD(&reg->ictrl); /* PCI Posted Write flush */
> > + mmiowb(); /* make sure this write arrives before any others */
>
> What's going on here?  In your docs you say this mmiowb() is explicitly
> to prevent write ordering problems and doesn't affect posting.  However
> in this patch you're using it to replace a posting flush read.

Jeremy was the one that added these, I think the comment is misleading and 
only ordering was intended.  If that's not the case I'll drop this bit.

>
> >   ha->flags.ints_enabled = 1;
>
> The result will be that we can get to here, but the write that enables
> the interrupt may still be posted in a bridge somewhere.

If we're waiting for an interrupt here, I don't think it matters if we flush 
or order, we'll wait the same amount of time regardless.

Thanks,
Jesse

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-23 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-23 18:48 [PATCH] I/O space write barrier Jesse Barnes
2004-09-23 19:03 ` James Bottomley
2004-09-23 19:07   ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2004-09-23 19:27     ` James Bottomley
2004-09-23 19:41       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-23 19:57       ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-23 22:22       ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-23 23:36         ` James Bottomley
2004-09-24  5:03           ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-23 19:55     ` Jeremy Higdon
2004-09-23 20:09       ` Jesse Barnes
2004-09-27  0:45 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-27 15:41   ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200409231507.26672.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --to=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox