* mask_irq
@ 2004-12-06 12:45 Matthew Wilcox
2004-12-06 13:31 ` mask_irq Russell King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2004-12-06 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arch
I don't know when it happened, but mask_irq() is no longer required
as an interface. The following architectures still define and/or use
it internally:
arm arm26 cris mips parisc ppc ppc64 sh sh64 x86_64
Arch maintainers may want to see if they can get rid of it.
--
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: mask_irq
2004-12-06 12:45 mask_irq Matthew Wilcox
@ 2004-12-06 13:31 ` Russell King
2004-12-06 13:36 ` mask_irq Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2004-12-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox; +Cc: linux-arch
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:45:53PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I don't know when it happened, but mask_irq() is no longer required
> as an interface. The following architectures still define and/or use
> it internally:
>
> arm arm26 cris mips parisc ppc ppc64 sh sh64 x86_64
I guess this is a result of a quick grep without looking at the
results. I think you'll find that mask_irq() isn't an interface
ARM architectures export, but is part of a function name, eg,
dummy_mask_unmask_irq().
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: mask_irq
2004-12-06 13:31 ` mask_irq Russell King
@ 2004-12-06 13:36 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2004-12-06 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox, linux-arch
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:31:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > I don't know when it happened, but mask_irq() is no longer required
> > as an interface. The following architectures still define and/or use
> > it internally:
> >
> > arm arm26 cris mips parisc ppc ppc64 sh sh64 x86_64
>
> I guess this is a result of a quick grep without looking at the
> results. I think you'll find that mask_irq() isn't an interface
> ARM architectures export, but is part of a function name, eg,
> dummy_mask_unmask_irq().
Same for MIPS but it deserved a little cleanup anyway which I just did.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-06 13:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-06 12:45 mask_irq Matthew Wilcox
2004-12-06 13:31 ` mask_irq Russell King
2004-12-06 13:36 ` mask_irq Ralf Baechle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox