public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* mask_irq
@ 2004-12-06 12:45 Matthew Wilcox
  2004-12-06 13:31 ` mask_irq Russell King
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2004-12-06 12:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arch


I don't know when it happened, but mask_irq() is no longer required
as an interface.  The following architectures still define and/or use
it internally:

arm arm26 cris mips parisc ppc ppc64 sh sh64 x86_64

Arch maintainers may want to see if they can get rid of it.

-- 
"Next the statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon 
the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those
conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse
to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince 
himself that the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep 
he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception." -- Mark Twain

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: mask_irq
  2004-12-06 12:45 mask_irq Matthew Wilcox
@ 2004-12-06 13:31 ` Russell King
  2004-12-06 13:36   ` mask_irq Ralf Baechle
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2004-12-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox; +Cc: linux-arch

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:45:53PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> I don't know when it happened, but mask_irq() is no longer required
> as an interface.  The following architectures still define and/or use
> it internally:
> 
> arm arm26 cris mips parisc ppc ppc64 sh sh64 x86_64

I guess this is a result of a quick grep without looking at the
results.  I think you'll find that mask_irq() isn't an interface
ARM architectures export, but is part of a function name, eg,
dummy_mask_unmask_irq().

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
                 2.6 Serial core

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: mask_irq
  2004-12-06 13:31 ` mask_irq Russell King
@ 2004-12-06 13:36   ` Ralf Baechle
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2004-12-06 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox, linux-arch

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:31:15PM +0000, Russell King wrote:

> > I don't know when it happened, but mask_irq() is no longer required
> > as an interface.  The following architectures still define and/or use
> > it internally:
> > 
> > arm arm26 cris mips parisc ppc ppc64 sh sh64 x86_64
> 
> I guess this is a result of a quick grep without looking at the
> results.  I think you'll find that mask_irq() isn't an interface
> ARM architectures export, but is part of a function name, eg,
> dummy_mask_unmask_irq().

Same for MIPS but it deserved a little cleanup anyway which I just did.

  Ralf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-06 13:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-06 12:45 mask_irq Matthew Wilcox
2004-12-06 13:31 ` mask_irq Russell King
2004-12-06 13:36   ` mask_irq Ralf Baechle

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox