From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
paulus@samba.org, akpm@osdl.org, dwmw2@infradead.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TASK_SIZE is variable.
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050131193828.GD12102@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050131112957.755e5a0c.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:29:57AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:23:54 +0100
> Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > > However, I like the mm->max_addr idea because that could be used
> > > for the mmap()/munmap()/mremap() sanity checks as well instead of
> > > bogus TASK_SIZE.
> >
> > Hmm, but in process context it is not bogus is it?
>
> I guess you're suggesting that there could be times when
> mm->max_addr and the current thread's address space disposition
> are out of sync?
No, i just think it's overkill for the simple task Paul wants
it for. And in mmap/munmap you can just trust what TASK_SIZE
tells you because it's in the correct process context.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-25 22:26 TASK_SIZE is variable David Woodhouse
2005-01-25 23:52 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-26 6:36 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-26 6:41 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-26 7:13 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-26 7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 7:43 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-26 8:01 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 8:04 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-28 2:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-28 3:11 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-28 3:17 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-28 6:40 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-29 11:23 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-01-28 8:46 ` Russell King
2005-01-28 6:39 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-28 11:32 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-26 7:54 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-29 20:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-29 23:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-30 11:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-30 12:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2005-01-31 2:23 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 9:23 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-31 19:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 19:38 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-01-31 20:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-03 4:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-03 6:28 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-03 7:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-02-03 9:23 ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-31 2:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050131193828.GD12102@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox