From: Grant Grundler <grundler@parisc-linux.org>
To: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pci: Arch hook to determine config space size
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 00:46:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050201074657.GA548@colo.lackof.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FE8994.4040802@us.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:40:04PM -0600, Brian King wrote:
> CC'ing the linux-pci mailing list...
thanks...
> > This patch adds an arch hook so
> > that individual archs can indicate if the underlying system supports
> > expanded config space accesses or not.
> >@@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ static int pci_cfg_space_size(struct pci
> > goto fail;
> > }
> >
> >+ if (!pcibios_exp_cfg_space(dev))
> >+ goto fail;
> > if (pci_read_config_dword(dev, 256, &status) != PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL)
> > goto fail;
pci_read_config_dword lands in arch specific code.
See drivers/pci/access.c:PCI_OP_READ() macro.
I'm missing what pcibios_exp_cfg_space() does that can't be handled by
the bus_ops supplied by pci_scan_bus().
I would expect the pci_read_config_dword to fail for being out of bounds.
Is that wrong?
Or is bus_ops not feasible in this case because pcibios needs access
to pci_dev?
If it's feasible, maybe the right place to add this hook is to
pci_read_config_dword which is also handed the pci_dev. And add
another function pointer to bus_ops (which could be NULL) to check
chipset support for Expanded Config space before calling
pci_bus_read_config_dword. Thats cleaner than adding a hook
before each use of pci_read_config_dword.
hth,
grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200501281456.j0SEuI12020454@d01av01.pok.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <20050128185234.GB21760@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <20050129040647.GA6261@kroah.com>
2005-01-31 19:10 ` pci: Arch hook to determine config space size Brian King
2005-01-31 19:15 ` Greg KH
2005-01-31 19:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-01-31 20:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-01-31 21:35 ` Brian King
2005-01-31 21:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-01-31 22:13 ` Greg KH
2005-01-31 22:43 ` Brian King
2005-02-01 3:15 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-01 4:52 ` Brian King
2005-02-01 4:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-02 10:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2005-02-03 0:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-02-01 12:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-02-01 20:16 ` Brian King
2005-01-31 19:40 ` Brian King
2005-02-01 7:46 ` Grant Grundler [this message]
2005-02-01 15:23 ` Brian King
2005-01-31 23:22 arndb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050201074657.GA548@colo.lackof.org \
--to=grundler@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox