From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:25:50 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" Subject: Re: [patch 19/24] TASK_SIZE is variable. Message-Id: <20050206142550.22a3ef3c.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20050206215020.GJ18245@wotan.suse.de> References: <200502050150.j151osl11380@mail.osdl.org> <20050205090619.C30866@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20050205154448.1cc89ee9.davem@davemloft.net> <20050206105047.GB6819@wotan.suse.de> <20050206131947.6524ece9.davem@davemloft.net> <20050206213148.GI18245@wotan.suse.de> <20050206133110.528ce713.davem@davemloft.net> <20050206215020.GJ18245@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andi Kleen Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:50:20 +0100 Andi Kleen wrote: > And yes this stuff does matter - i remember i got LM benchmarkable > improvements in signal latency by optimizing __copy_to_user > to use optimized inlines for small stores.