From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:07:56 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Changing  update_mmu_cache()
Message-Id: <20050225150756.02331522.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050225224809.F27842@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1109047997.5327.70.camel@gaston>
	<20050222090741.B16786@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20050222100858.27d05a86.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20050225201538.B27842@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<20050225134322.43274a9a.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20050225224809.F27842@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>

Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry, I'm completely at the end of my rag over this.  I, for
> one, can't operate with keeping up with the mainline kernel while
> having these kinds of invasive patches outstanding for 4+ months
> with zero help,

I can help.  Send 'em over.  It's what I do.

> and little prospect of them getting merged.

Is there a technical problem, or are the problems merely general time and
patch monkeying things?