From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Consolidation of asm/unaligned.h
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 16:11:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405151151.GN5227@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050405150218.GD16157@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 04:02:18PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > Could you verify that the addition of the consts to the inline function
> > size arguments (previously posted patch) fixes this? If so, I'll send
> > the patch on.
>
> FWIW, adding consts doesn't help gcc-3.0. I don't have a problem with
> forcing people to upgrade from 3.0 to 3.3, I just wanted to be sure
> everyone's aware of the problem.
3.0 has been a significant source of trouble on MIPS. Fortunately 3.0
and 3.1 seems to have died out already so I don't need to force anybody :)
Ralf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-05 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-17 18:47 Consolidation of asm/unaligned.h David S. Miller
2005-03-17 21:33 ` Russell King
2005-03-17 21:51 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-17 21:57 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-03-17 22:03 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-18 0:20 ` Richard Henderson
2005-03-18 4:13 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-17 23:27 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-03-18 0:25 ` David Woodhouse
2005-04-04 3:42 ` James Bottomley
2005-04-04 4:02 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-04 4:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-04-04 6:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-04-04 11:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-04 10:47 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-05 14:10 ` James Bottomley
2005-04-05 14:15 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-05 15:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 15:11 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050405151151.GN5227@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox