From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] consolidate sys_shmat
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:50:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050427125015.GU30431@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050427162709.6851e14b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 04:27:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I have minimised this patch a bit. It now just consolidates sys_shmat and
> in doing so, "fixes" the ABIs for MIPS(64) and ARM. ARM glibc does not
> use the sys_shmnat syscall directly so far (as far as I can see) and on
> MIPS64, the ABI that glibc seems to expect (I am pretty much guessing) is
> the fixed one.
Correct, so the patch is looking ok.
Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-27 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-23 4:01 [PATCH] consolidate asm/ipc.h Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 4:12 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-23 6:48 ` [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 10:54 ` David Howells
2005-04-05 8:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 14:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 8:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-05 13:03 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-04-05 20:00 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-05 20:16 ` Russell King
2005-04-05 20:20 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-04-06 15:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-07 5:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-11 20:29 ` Russell King
2005-04-27 6:27 ` [PATCH] consolidate sys_shmat Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-27 12:50 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2005-04-27 14:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-04-05 8:05 ` [PATCH] consolidate shmat usage Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 8:06 ` [PATCH] consolidate asm/ipc.h Andi Kleen
2005-03-24 0:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-03-23 10:49 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050427125015.GU30431@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox