From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 03:13:14 -0700
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: Lots of possible arch breakage in cpu_idle!!
Message-ID: <20050529101314.GN2057@holomorphy.com>
References: <4299523F.90502@yahoo.com.au> <20050529084541.GL2057@holomorphy.com> <42999381.2070800@yahoo.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <42999381.2070800@yahoo.com.au>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>

On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 08:03:45PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hmm, it is against the latest -mm, with a couple of patches
> backed out and one or two others applied :P
> If you are just interested in looking at the arch code, I think
> that should apply to any recent tree.
> Otherwise, let me know off list.

I'm only going to fiddle with the sparc32 bits.


-- wli