From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: matthew@wil.cx, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, haveblue@us.ibm.com,
matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com, bob.picco@hp.com
Subject: Re: sparsemem patches in -mm
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:01:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050621130150.62fbd353.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42B83771.1050304@shadowen.org>
Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
>
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 02:13:52AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> >>Could I ask the arch maintainers to review the `sparsemem' patches from -mm,
> >>please, if you haven't done so...
> >>
> >>They're all in http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/sparsemem/
> >
> >
> > Pretty confusing. All kinds of options added, removed, modified, put
> > back ... let's merge it, then see how it looks. Maybe we'll switch
> > parisc from discontigmem to sparsemem.
>
> Would it make sense for me to take the current pile of patches in -mm
> and merge the fixes into the appropriate main patches to make a
> consolidated patch set? If we want to do that I am happy to put the
> effort in.
I've already done some of that, but I need to do another pass.
<looks>
The patches I have there seem fairly logical, although there's a lot of
Kconfig futzing going on. Do you spy any patches which should be collapsed
together there? If so, which?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-21 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-21 9:13 sparsemem patches in -mm Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 9:50 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-21 10:09 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-21 15:49 ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-06-21 15:58 ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-21 11:00 ` Bob Picco
2005-06-21 15:57 ` Dave Hansen
2005-06-21 16:45 ` Bob Picco
2005-06-21 14:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-21 15:51 ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-06-21 20:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-06-21 23:39 ` Dave Hansen
2005-06-22 5:46 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-22 6:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-27 22:42 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-23 22:48 ` Roman Zippel
2005-06-23 22:56 ` Dave Hansen
2005-06-23 23:53 ` Roman Zippel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-21 15:52 Luck, Tony
2005-06-21 15:58 ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-06-21 16:09 Luck, Tony
2005-06-21 16:17 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050621130150.62fbd353.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=bob.picco@hp.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox