From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:21:46 +0200 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH consolidate sys_ptrace Message-ID: <20051102112146.GB14639@linux-sh.org> References: <20051101050900.GA25793@lst.de> <20051101051221.GA26017@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051101051221.GA26017@lst.de> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:12:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:09:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude > > them. They continue to keep their implementations. For sh64 I had to > > add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does some initialization on the > > first call. For um I removed an ifdefed SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL block, > > but SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL isn't defined anywhere in the tree. >=20 > Umm, it might be a good idea to actually send the current patch instead > of the old one. I really should write this text from scratch instead > of copying it :) >=20 >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig >=20 sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks. Acked-by: Paul Mundt --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDaKFJ1K+teJFxZ9wRAu/kAJ4+xE34Y9SpqHD1mwAwv1P1YO4vuwCfcWzM 1YYaghhmIfXY0dwXbb/S+eg= =7bi9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--