From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 01:15:40 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation
Message-Id: <20051213011540.3070176f.akpm@osdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <20051213090517.GQ23384@wotan.suse.de>
References: <dhowells1134431145@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	<20051212161944.3185a3f9.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20051213075441.GB6765@elte.hu>
	<20051213075835.GZ15804@wotan.suse.de>
	<20051213004257.0f87d814.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20051213084926.GN23384@wotan.suse.de>
	<20051213010126.0832356d.akpm@osdl.org>
	<20051213090517.GQ23384@wotan.suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, dhowells@redhat.com, torvalds@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, arjan@infradead.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arch.vger.kernel.org>

Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:01:26AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you please apply the following patch then? 
> > > 
> > >  Remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> > 
> > OK.
> > 
> > Thus far I have this:
> 
> Would it be possible to drop support for gcc 3.0 too? 

Spose so - I don't know what people are using out there.

> AFAIK it has never been widely used. If we assume 3.1+ minimum it has the 
> advantage that named assembly arguments work, which make
> the inline assembly often a lot easier to read and maintain.

There are a few places in the tree which refuse to compile with 3.1 and 3.2.