From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20051216143110.GC1222@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20051216143110.GC1222@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1134556187.2894.7.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1134558188.25663.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1134558507.2894.22.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1134559470.25663.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051214033536.05183668.akpm@osdl.org> <15412.1134561432@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <11202.1134730942@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <43A2BAA7.5000807@yahoo.com.au> <20051216132123.GB1222@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/19] MUTEX: Introduce simple mutex implementation Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:46:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20058.1134748001@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: dhowells@redhat.com To: Russell King Cc: Linh Dang , Nick Piggin , David Howells , Arjan van de Ven , Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , Christopher Friesen , torvalds@osdl.org, hch@infradead.org, matthew@wil.cx, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Russell King wrote: > Do you now see what I mean? (yup, ARM is a llsc architecture.) Out of interest, at what point did ARM become so? ARM6? David