From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.153]:54705 "EHLO mtagate4.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750765AbWATJoP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2006 04:44:15 -0500 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0K9hdln178140 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:43:43 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VERS6.8) with ESMTP id k0K9hG8Q199934 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:43:16 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0K9hGKY032296 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:43:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:43:09 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: new syscalls Message-ID: <20060120094309.GA9349@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <20060117192949.625f246b.akpm@osdl.org> <200601180438.03957.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601180438.03957.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > Verious new syscalls which are trickling their way Linuswards and will need > > testing and wiring up once they get there: > > > > sys_migrate_pages > > Merged > > #define __NR_migrate_pages 256 > __SYSCALL(__NR_migrate_pages, sys_migrate_pages) > > > We first have to wait if everybody survived crossing the 8bit boundary @) Any reason why arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S has sys_futimesat in its syscall table instead of compat_sys_futimesat? Looks wrong to me... Thanks, Heiko