From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54492 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932593AbWF3Mo5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2006 08:44:57 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch] s390 kconfig cleanup, 2nd version. Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:44:26 +0200 References: <1151670404.11575.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1151670404.11575.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200606301444.26446.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk, chrisw@sous-sol.org, matthew@wil.cx, akpm@osdl.org List-ID: On Friday 30 June 2006 14:26, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > Hi folks, > it has been a few weeks since the s390 kconfig discussion died down. > I have put together a new patch that includes all of the suggestions > made so far. With this patch "make allyesconfig" and "make allmodconfig" > now works on s390. > > Please check that it does not break anything on your favorite > architecture. It really shouldn't but you never know. I want to push > this patch soon. I must say I still hate the negative !S390. It would be much better to define something positive. If PCI doesn't work maybe something else. -Andi