From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.93.40.71]:53726 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422790AbWHYAcC (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:32:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:32:00 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] unify all architecture PAGE_SIZE definitions Message-ID: <20060825003200.GF3580@holomorphy.com> References: <20060824234445.6B519D52@localhost.localdomain> <20060824235806.GD3580@holomorphy.com> <1156464441.12011.151.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060825001459.GE3580@holomorphy.com> <1156465424.12011.159.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156465424.12011.159.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:23:44PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > Is it the Kconfig names themselves which you don't like? I guess it is > a bit silly to have CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_X, defined to be number Y, which is > then calculated back to being X again. But, we were really already > doing that (in three places): An integer define would do. Then again, it occurs to me this might be some sort of garbage so one can write "4KB," "8KB," etc. on the menus presented to the users. -- wli