From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:29392 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402AbWH1IDK (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:03:10 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:03:02 +0200 References: <20060827214734.252316000@klappe.arndb.de> <200608280950.04441.ak@suse.de> <200608281001.39381.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <200608281001.39381.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608281003.02757.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , Bjoern Steinbrink , Arjan van de Ven , Chase Venters , Andrew Morton , Russell King , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse List-ID: On Monday 28 August 2006 10:01, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 28 August 2006 09:50, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Or just keep the current ones that work fine? > > > > Are you sure they do? Since dwmw2 did the changeset > 56142536868a2be34f261ed8fdca1610f8a73fbd, they are all inside > #ifdef __KERNEL__. You may argue that merging that patch was > wrong and it should be reverted, but now that we have it, the > code is not relevant for user space anymore. Thanks for brining it to my attention. I indeed think think the patch was wrong. -Andi