From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.188]:17900 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbWH1IJn (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 04:09:43 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:09:10 +0200 References: <20060827214734.252316000@klappe.arndb.de> <200608280941.10965.arnd@arndb.de> <1156751177.3034.158.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1156751177.3034.158.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608281009.11352.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , Bjoern Steinbrink , Chase Venters , Andrew Morton , Russell King , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 28 August 2006 09:46, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > we or the (g)libc headers ? > I don't think having libc do it. In order to use these macros, you always had to #include or . Putting the headers into a libc file means that user code would need to change its includes, when it really should just use . Changing the libc copy of asm/unistd.h is against our current plan to get to a point where `make headers_install' gets you a working tree. _If_ we want to have it in there, it needs to be in the kernel source. Arnd <><