From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:34790 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964797AbWH1K7f (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 06:59:35 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 12:58:56 +0200 References: <200608281003.02757.ak@suse.de> <1156759232.5340.36.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <1156761447.3034.178.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> In-Reply-To: <1156761447.3034.178.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608281258.56199.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, akpm@osdl.org, chase.venters@clientec.com, B.Steinbrink@gmx.de, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, David Miller List-ID: > the x86_64 macros use the VDSO page? great! I didn't know that. > But that would make them unusable for kernel use I suspect... Not sure what you're talking about. x86-64 64bit system calls don't go through a vDSO -Andi (who is out of the thread which seems to be full of unconstructive polemics now)