From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:53670 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751130AbWH1Pw4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:52:56 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:00:09 +0200 References: <200608281003.02757.ak@suse.de> <200608281642.21737.ak@suse.de> <20060828154634.GA3450@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20060828154634.GA3450@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608281900.10191.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Arnd Bergmann , David Woodhouse , David Miller , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, B.Steinbrink@gmx.de, arjan@infradead.org, chase.venters@clientec.com, akpm@osdl.org, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > This would only be required if you'd upgrade the userspace kernel > headers on this system to a version not matching the ones glibc was > built against - and this has never been considered a good idea > (it should work in theory, but not with our current header mess). Sorry, but that's just utterly wrong. It has always worked. The kernel ABI is stable on this level. -Andi