From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38815 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbWH3HZB (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Aug 2006 03:25:01 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] remove all remaining _syscallX macros Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:22:09 +0200 References: <200608281003.02757.ak@suse.de> <200608281642.21737.ak@suse.de> <44F525BC.4020608@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <44F525BC.4020608@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608300922.09436.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Arnd Bergmann , David Woodhouse , David Miller , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, B.Steinbrink@gmx.de, arjan@infradead.org, chase.venters@clientec.com, akpm@osdl.org, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Why don't you just have a private version of the macros? Because I don't write a libc, just test programs, preferably without a huge amount of cut'n'pasted code -Andi