From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] re-add -ffreestanding
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 07:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060907063049.GA15029@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060906223748.GC12157@stusta.de>
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 12:37:48AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 07:39:05PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Looking at the effect of -ffreestanding on ARM, it appears that on one
> > hand, the overall image size is reduced by 0.016% but we end up with worse
> > code - eg, strlen() of the same string in the same function evaluated
> > multiple times vs once without -ffreestanding.
> >
> > The difference probably comes down to the lack of __attribute__((pure))
> > on our string functions in linux/string.h.
> >
> > If we are going to go for -ffreestanding, we need to fix linux/string.h
> > in that respect _first_.
>
> We are talking about reverting the patch that removed -ffreestanding,
> and that broke at least two architectures although it wrongly claimed
> it would have been a safe patch.
Wrong. Your patch unconditionally adds it for _ALL_ architectures.
Below is the extract which you posted which supports this fact.
For the elimination of any doubt, I do _NOT_ want this patch merged as
is. Take that as the _third_ architecture maintainer who has NACK'd
your patch (as you should've taken my first objection as that and
apparantly didn't.)
... and maybe you should copy linux-arch with architecture-wide changes
so that all architecture maintainers are aware of what you're trying to
do?
--- linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm3/Makefile.old 2006-08-30 16:59:31.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.18-rc4-mm3/Makefile 2006-08-30 17:02:42.000000000 +0200
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
CPPFLAGS := -D__KERNEL__ $(LINUXINCLUDE)
CFLAGS := -Wall -Wundef -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs \
- -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common
+ -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -ffreestanding
AFLAGS := -D__ASSEMBLY__
# Read KERNELRELEASE from include/config/kernel.release (if it exists)
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-07 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060830175727.GI18276@stusta.de>
[not found] ` <200608302013.58122.ak@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20060830183905.GB31594@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20060906223748.GC12157@stusta.de>
2006-09-07 6:30 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-09-07 10:27 ` [2.6 patch] re-add -ffreestanding Adrian Bunk
2006-09-07 11:40 ` Roman Zippel
2006-09-07 11:43 ` Russell King
2006-09-07 14:03 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-09-07 14:25 ` Russell King
2006-09-07 14:29 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060907063049.GA15029@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox