From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:14518 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750855AbWIJKLy (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:11:54 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert [i386/x86_64]: Remove __KERNEL__ ifdef around _syscall*() Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:33:41 +0200 References: <200608302359.k7UNxIZW027536@hera.kernel.org> <20060904123801.905fabc6.akpm@osdl.org> <1157881687.2977.111.camel@pmac.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1157881687.2977.111.camel@pmac.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200609101033.41833.ak@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: Andrew Morton , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann List-ID: On Sunday 10 September 2006 11:48, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 12:38 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > What we have _now_, however, is entirely unacceptable. Please apply the > > > following patch to fix it: > > > > whimper. that gives me a reject storm to fix up. > > It shouldn't bother you for long -- the intention was that the patch > would be applied ASAP, so that this regression doesn't make its way into > 2.6.18 final. I don't think there is anything unacceptable in 2.6.18 in this area right now. So 2.6.18 should be fine, and hopefully in the future we will keep this useful facility too. -Andi