From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:50443 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750762AbWIOIrv (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:47:51 -0400 Date: 15 Sep 2006 10:47:49 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 10:47:49 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] make PROT_WRITE imply PROT_READ Message-ID: <20060915084749.GC9672@muc.de> References: <200609150139.k8F1dl7Y014791@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200609150139.k8F1dl7Y014791@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@osdl.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, jbaron@redhat.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, arjan@linux.intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, hugh@veritas.com, kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp, lethal@linux-sh.org, paulus@samba.org, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, spyro@f2s.com, tony.luck@intel.com, zippel@linux-m68k.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:39:47PM -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > From: Jason Baron > > (akpm: needs to be split into nine patches and fed through arch trees. > Later.) > > (err, make it's easier to just collect some acks?) x86_64 part is ok for me. -Andi