From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from saraswathi.solana.com ([198.99.130.12]:57784 "EHLO saraswathi.solana.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751198AbWISWIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:08:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:03:38 -0400 From: Jeff Dike Subject: Re: All arch maintainers: 'make headers_check' fails on most architectures. Message-ID: <20060919220338.GB7435@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <1158079495.9189.125.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <1158478779.24527.209.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20060919153129.GD4820@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <1158680369.24527.443.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1158680369.24527.443.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Woodhouse Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, spyro@f2s.com, starvik@axis.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, davem@davemloft.net, wli@holomorphy.com, uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp, chris@zankel.net, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, dhowells , ralf@linux-mips.org, kyle@parisc-linux.org List-ID: On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 04:39:29PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2006-09-19 at 11:31 -0400, Jeff Dike wrote: > > Is it OK that this happens when I do that: > > > > /home/jdike/linux/2.6/linux-2.6.17/scripts/Makefile.headersinst:42: /home/jdike/linux/2.6/linux-2.6.17/include/asm-um/Kbuild: No such file or directory > > make[3]: *** No rule to make target > > `/home/jdike/linux/2.6/linux-2.6.17/include/asm-um/Kbuild'. Stop. > > Er, yes. I don't think it makes any sense to export headers specifically > for UM. I wonder why my shadow git tree has them... Well, my question was, is it OK for make to explode when headers_check is done for UML, or should it do nothing silently? Jeff