From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:10417 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965107AbWJBU5L (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:57:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:56:48 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers Message-Id: <20061002135648.9250b51d.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20061002162049.17763.39576.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20061002162053.17763.26032.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20061002132116.2663d7a3.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: David Howells , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , David Brownell , Alan Stern List-ID: On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:43:38 -0400 "Dmitry Torokhov" wrote: > > > > I think the change is good. But I don't want to maintain this whopper > > out-of-tree for two months! If we want to do this, we should just smash it > > in and grit our teeth. > > Yes, lets drop it in while we still not reached rc1. Doing it after -rc1 would be saner, when the tree isn't changing at a megabyte-per-minute. Give people at least a couple of days to review it, test it, etc.