From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ftp.linux-mips.org ([194.74.144.162]:22481 "EHLO ftp.linux-mips.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753485AbWKFRNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:13:06 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:32431 "EHLO dl5rb.ham-radio-op.net") by ftp.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S20038431AbWKFRNF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:13:05 +0000 Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 17:13:28 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: Which architectures need 64-bit resources? Message-ID: <20061106171328.GB20439@linux-mips.org> References: <20061106122337.GK27140@parisc-linux.org> <20061106160206.GA10447@linux-mips.org> <20061106163243.GN27140@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061106163243.GN27140@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal List-ID: On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:32:43AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > Here's a proposed patch (which needs buy-in from the ARM, MIPS and > PowerPC guys, plus anyone who knows about x86-32 machines with 64-bit > IO). Grepping the arch/*/configs/* doesn't show anyone else using it by > default. > > I got the info for ARM from Vince Sanders, and made my best guess for > MIPS & PPC. This patch is entirely untested. The MIPS segment looks good, so feel free to add an Acked-by me. Ralf