From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:51797 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932147AbXACVdP (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:33:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:33:13 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: + use-cycle_t-instead-of-u64-in-struct-time_interpolator.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20070103213313.GC24620@parisc-linux.org> References: <200701032100.l03L0REl031061@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> <20070103210551.GB24620@parisc-linux.org> <20070103132537.7743b0bd.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070103132537.7743b0bd.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: deller@gmx.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de List-ID: On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 01:25:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Well yeah, but I think he did that because of some unrelated parisc borkage. It's simply impossible to implement cmpxchg() in the general case on parisc. This was hashed out in great detail recently ...