public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hch@infradead.org
Cc: jbeulich@novell.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI DAC DMA APIs
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 18:18:55 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070315.181855.18293618.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070315191834.GA12603@infradead.org>

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:18:34 +0000

> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:38:13PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > While the kernel headers provide for this, there don't appear to be any
> > in-tree users (which seems contrary to general Linux policies). Would there
> > be objections to remove all of these?
> 
> They should go away.  Having them in for more than five years without
> any users is almost a guarantee for bitrot.

Yes, probably we should get rid of them.

The idea wasn't sparc optimizations, it was for things like those
Dolphin clustering cards that essentially want to get at all of
physical memory from the PCI card.

The IOMMU is a limited resource, so at the expense of lack of
prefetching and write caching we provide a way to do unlimited DMA
mapping with 64-bit DAC addresses.

None of these drivers ever got integrated, so it's a total loss.

Someone will complain when we pull it out, but fsck them, they
had years to do something about this. :)


      reply	other threads:[~2007-03-16  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-15 12:38 PCI DAC DMA APIs Jan Beulich
2007-03-15 13:23 ` Andi Kleen
2007-03-15 18:37 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-03-15 19:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-03-16  1:18   ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070315.181855.18293618.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox