linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Better local_t implementation needed
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:14:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704202214.17774.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A015F22E3@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Friday 20 April 2007 20:31:45 Luck, Tony wrote:
> > Using local_t for per cpu counters is nice because then
> > one can use cpu_local_add() etc. and that generates very good 
> > code at least on x86 and a few other architectures. That would
> > then allow very cheap per CPU statistics, which are useful
> > in a number of subsystems (like networking or MM code)
> 
> But be warned that aggregating the per-cpu counters can be very
> expensive on high cpu count ia64 systems.  We've had issues with
> /proc files that provide system counts that do this in a cache
> hostile way.

Can you expand? What cache hostile way?

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-20 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-20 10:56 Better local_t implementation needed Andi Kleen
2007-04-20 16:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 17:01   ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-20 17:05     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 18:31 ` Luck, Tony
2007-04-20 20:14   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-04-20 20:27     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-20 21:25 ` Roman Zippel
2007-04-20 22:39   ` David Miller
2007-04-21  0:25     ` Christoph Lameter
2007-04-21  4:45       ` David Miller
     [not found] <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A015F2392@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
2007-04-20 20:38 ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200704202214.17774.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).