From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: buytenh@wantstofly.org
Cc: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [CFT] read+shared mmap write+read data corruption
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 22:35:50 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070528.223550.39158516.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070528124411.GA31764@xi.wantstofly.org>
From: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:44:11 +0200
> On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 07:31:27PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > On munmap we do a flush_cache_range for the unmapped vmas ... we
> > have to, otherwise the data might be lost as the user mapping is
> > zapped and we wouldn't be able to guarantee coherency writing it
> > to the backing store.
>
> As far as I understand it, the munmap() does flush out the copy of
> the data at the user virtual address, but the subsequent read() call
> reads from an address in the kernel direct mapped window, for which
> there is still data in the cache due to the earlier read() syscall,
> and the mapping_writably_mapped() test fails so we don't end up
> calling flush_dcache_page().
That is what is happening for sure.
That mapping_writably_mapped() check depends upon munmap()
flush out the lines from the cache on the user side at
least enough to make them coherent on the kernel side.
As I said my flush_cache_range() on sparc64 used to do this,
but I removed it for whatever reason, perhaps I did not
consider this case back then.
I'm not advocating a full flush on flush_cache_range(), but rather to
set a page state bit, which will force a flush on the
"check_dcache_page()" call which we could replace this conditionalized
flush_dcache_page() call with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-29 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-27 10:49 [CFT] read+shared mmap write+read data corruption Russell King
2007-05-27 14:16 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-27 22:25 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-27 23:06 ` David Miller
2007-05-27 23:05 ` David Miller
2007-05-28 0:31 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-28 12:44 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-29 5:35 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-05-29 9:12 ` Russell King
2007-05-29 10:26 ` David Miller
2007-05-27 22:24 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-28 0:00 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-28 10:05 ` Russell King
2007-05-28 14:17 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-28 14:39 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-29 3:06 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-29 3:15 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-29 14:32 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-29 17:13 ` Russell King
2007-05-29 5:58 ` David Miller
2007-05-28 15:04 ` Russell King
2007-05-29 15:42 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-28 12:33 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2007-05-28 14:22 ` James Bottomley
2007-05-28 12:38 ` Lennert Buytenhek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070528.223550.39158516.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox