linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [BUG] Fault handlers can deadlock
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 17:00:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070611160026.GA16265@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)

Recently, a bug has been discovered on ARM whereby if futexes are
being used and the system is put under heavy load, a deadlock will
occur.

The deadlock involves mmap_sem having been taken by the futex code
and a page fault occuring in copy_from_user_inatomic().  We then
hit this:

        /*
         * As per x86, we may deadlock here.  However, since the kernel only
         * validly references user space from well defined areas of the code,
         * we can bug out early if this is from code which shouldn't.
         */
        if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
                if (!user_mode(regs) && !search_exception_tables(regs->ARM_pc))
                        goto no_context;
                down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
        }

which is more or less identical across many architectures.  The
problem is that:

1. down_read_trylock() finds contention, so it returns 0.
2. we've been called from kernel mode
3. search_exception_tables() finds an entry in the exception
   tables (see note about "well defined areas of the code") and
   returns *non*-NULL
4. therefore, the second if statement is _false_.
5. we then deadlock on down_read(&mm->mmap_sem).

Note that search_exception_tables() is generic code, and I believe rwsems
are also generic code today.

For reference, he's the x86 version, which will perform in the same
way as the ARM version quoted above:

        /* When running in the kernel we expect faults to occur only to
         * addresses in user space.  All other faults represent errors in the
         * kernel and should generate an OOPS.  Unfortunatly, in the case of an
         * erroneous fault occurring in a code path which already holds mmap_sem
         * we will deadlock attempting to validate the fault against the
         * address space.  Luckily the kernel only validly references user
         * space from well defined areas of code, which are listed in the
         * exceptions table.
         *
         * As the vast majority of faults will be valid we will only perform
         * the source reference check when there is a possibilty of a deadlock.
         * Attempt to lock the address space, if we cannot we then validate the
         * source.  If this is invalid we can skip the address space check,
         * thus avoiding the deadlock.
         */
        if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
                if ((error_code & 4) == 0 &&
                    !search_exception_tables(regs->eip))
                        goto bad_area_nosemaphore;
                down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
        }

Clearly, if we are expecting to deal with faults occuring from these "well
defined areas of code, which are listed in the exceptions table" the
sense if the test is wrong.

Therefore, I think the following patch is appropriate (and similar patches
are required for other architectures):

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index 75d4914..e41efd9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ do_page_fault(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 * we can bug out early if this is from code which shouldn't.
 	 */
 	if (!down_read_trylock(&mm->mmap_sem)) {
-		if (!user_mode(regs) && !search_exception_tables(regs->ARM_pc))
+		if (!user_mode(regs) && search_exception_tables(regs->ARM_pc))
 			goto no_context;
 		down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	}

Comments?

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

             reply	other threads:[~2007-06-11 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-11 16:00 Russell King [this message]
2007-06-11 16:41 ` [BUG] Fault handlers can deadlock Andrew Morton
2007-06-11 16:53   ` Russell King
2007-06-11 17:31     ` Andrew Morton
2007-06-11 17:38       ` Russell King
2007-06-11 17:51     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-11 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-06-11 18:08   ` Russell King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070611160026.GA16265@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).