From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:58520 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbXFYKfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:35:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 04:35:35 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARM Message-ID: <20070625103535.GF22063@parisc-linux.org> References: <1182761357.12109.14.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20070625021145.b84ea186.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070625021145.b84ea186.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Woodhouse , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulus@samba.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk List-ID: On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 02:11:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > ABI. How would you like "it would be nice if maintainers of oddball > architectures would pay attention"? If new syscalls got posted to linux-arch for discussion, I assure you, we'd pay attention.