From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:56495 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760006AbXF1LWl (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:22:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:22:39 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT? Message-ID: <20070628112239.GD22063@parisc-linux.org> References: <13566.1183022110@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13566.1183022110@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Keith Owens Cc: no@parisc-linux.org, To-header@parisc-linux.org, on@parisc-linux.org, "input <"@parisc-linux.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:15:10PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > Arch code tests CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS, but the kconfig files define > CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT. Which is correct? Both: ./lib/Kconfig.debug:config TRACE_IRQFLAGS ./lib/Kconfig.debug: depends on TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT _SUPPORT means the arch supports it. TRACE_IRQFLAGS means it's turned on.